Other Blueprints
The previous sections describe how to deploy three Aether blueprints,
corresponding to three variants of var/main.yml
. This section
documents additional blueprints, each defined by a combination of
Ansible components:
A
vars/main-blueprint.yml
file, checked into theaether-onramp
repo, is the "root" of the blueprint specification.A
hosts.ini
file, documented by example, specifies the target servers required by the blueprint.A set of Make targets, defined in a submodule and imported into OnRamp's global Makefile, provides commands to install and uninstall the blueprint.
(Optional) A new
aether-blueprint
repo defines the Ansible Roles and Playbooks required to deploy a new component.(Optional) New Roles, Playbooks, and Templates, checked to existing repos/submodules, customize existing components for integration with the new blueprint. To support blueprint independence, these elements are intentionally kept "narrow", rather than glommed onto an existing element.
(Optional) Any additional hardware (beyond the Ansible-managed Aether servers) required to support the blueprint.
A Jenkins pipeline, added to the set of OnRamp integration tests, verifies that the blueprint successfully deploys Aether. These pipelines are defined by Groovy scripts, and can be found in the
aether-jenkins
repo.
The goal of establishing a well-defined procedure for adding new blueprints to OnRamp is to encourage the community to contribute (and maintain) new Aether configurations and deployment scenarios.[1] The rest of this section documents community-contributed blueprints to-date.
Finally, because some blueprints include features that are not
compatible with simple configurations like Quick Start, it is
sometimes necessary to install/uninstall Aether using a set of narrow
Make targets (e.g., 5gc-upf-install
) rather than a single broad
target (e.g., aether-5gc-install
). Such situations are documented
in the following subsections.
Multiple UPFs
The base version of SD-Core includes a single UPF, running in the same Kubernetes namespace as the Core's control plane. This blueprint adds the ability to bring up multiple UPFs (each in a different namespace), and uses ROC to establish the UPF-to-Slice-to-Device bindings required to activate end-to-end user traffic. The resulting deployment is then verified using gNBsim.
The Multi-UPF blueprint includes the following:
Global vars file
vars/main-upf.yml
gives the overall blueprint specification.Inventory file
hosts.ini
is identical to that used in the Emulated RAN section. Minimally, SD-Core runs on one server and gNBsim runs on a second server. (The Quick Start deployment, with both SD-Core and gNBsim running in the same server, also works.)New make targets,
5gc-upf-install
and5gc-upf-uninstall
, to be executed after the standard SD-Core installation. The blueprint also reuses theroc-load
target to activate new slices in ROC.New Ansible role (
upf
) added to the5gc
submodule, including a new UPF-specific template (upf-5g-values.yaml
).New models file (
roc-5g-models-upf2.json
) added to theroc-load
role in theamp
submodule. This models file is applied as a patch on top of the base set of ROC models. (Since this blueprint is demonstrated using gNBsim, the assumed base models are given byroc-5g-models.json
.)The Jenkins pipeline
upf.groovy
validates the Multi-UPF blueprint.
To use Multi-UPF, first copy the vars file to main.yml
:
$ cd vars
$ cp main-upf.yml main.yml
Then edit hosts.ini
and vars/main.yml
to match your local
target servers, and deploy the base system (as in previous sections).
You can also optionally install the monitoring subsystem.
$ make k8s-install
$ make roc-install
$ make roc-load
$ make 5gc-install
$ make gnbsim-install
Note that because main.yml
sets core.standalone: "false"
, any
models loaded into ROC are automatically applied to SD-Core.
At this point you are ready to bring up additional UPFs and bind them
to specific slices and devices. An example configuration that brings
up second UPF is included in the upf
block in the core
section
of vars/main.yml
:
upf:
ip_prefix: "192.168.252.0/24"
iface: "access"
helm:
chart_ref: aether/bess-upf
values_file: "deps/5gc/roles/upf/templates/upf-5g-values.yaml"
additional_upfs:
"1":
ip:
access: "192.168.252.6/24"
core: "192.168.250.6/24"
ue_ip_pool: "172.248.0.0/16"
# "2":
# ip:
# access: "192.168.252.7/24"
# core: "192.168.250.7/24"
# ue_ip_pool: "172.247.0.0/16"
As shown above, one additional UPF is enabled (beyond upf-0
that
already came up as part of SD-Core), with the spec for yet another UPF
commented out. In this example configuration, each UPF is assigned a
subnet on the access
and core
bridges, along with the IP
address pool for UEs that the UPF serves. To launch this second UPF,
type:
$ make 5gc-upf-install
At this point the new UPF(s) will be running in their own namespaces
(you can verify this using kubectl get pods --all-namespaces
), but
no traffic will be directed to them until UEs are assigned to their IP
address pool. Doing so requires loading the appropriate bindings into
ROC, which you can do by editing the roc_models
line in amp
section of vars/main.yml
. Comment out the original models file
already loaded into ROC, and uncomment the new patch that is to be
applied:
amp:
# roc_models: "deps/amp/roles/roc-load/templates/roc-5g-models.json"
roc_models: "deps/amp/roles/roc-load/templates/roc-5g-models-upf2.json"
Then run the following to load the patch:
$ make roc-load
At this point you can bring up the Aether GUI and see that a second slice and a second device group have been mapped onto the second UPF.
Now you are ready to run traffic through both UPFs, which because the
configuration files identified in the servers
block of the
gnbsim
section of vars/main.yml
align with the IMSIs bound to
each Device Group (which are bound to each slice, which are in turn
bound to each UPF), the emulator sends data through both UPFs. To run
the emulation, type:
$ make gnbsim-simulator-run
To verify that both UPFs were functional, you will need to look at the
summary.log
file from both instances of gNBsim:
$ docker exec -it gnbsim-1 cat summary.log
$ docker exec -it gnbsim-2 cat summary.log
SD-RAN (RIC)
This blueprint runs SD-Core and SD-RAN's near real-time RIC in tandem, with RANSIM emulating various RAN elements. (The OnRamp roadmap includes plans to couple SD-RAN with other virtual and physical RAN elements, but RANSIM is currently the only option.)
The SD-RAN blueprint includes the following:
Global vars file
vars/main-sdran.yml
gives the overall blueprint specification.Inventory file
hosts.ini
is identical to that used in the Quick Start deployment, with both SD-RAN and SD-Core co-located on a single server.New make targets,
sdran-install
andsdran-uninstall
, to be executed after the standard SD-Core installation.A new submodule
deps/sdran
(corresponding to repoaether-sdran
) defines the Ansible Roles and Playbooks required to deploy SD-RAN.The Jenkins pipeline
sdran.groovy
validates the SD-RAN blueprint.
To use SD-RAN, first copy the vars file to main.yml
:
$ cd vars
$ cp main-sdran.yml main.yml
Then edit hosts.ini
and vars/main.yml
to match your local
target servers, and deploy the base system (as in previous sections),
followed by SD-RAN:
$ make k8s-install
$ make 5gc-install
$ make sdran-install
Use kubectl
to validate that the SD-RAN workload is running, which
should result in output similar to the following:
$ kubectl get pods -n sdran
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
onos-a1t-68c59fb46-8mnng 2/2 Running 0 3m12s
onos-cli-c7d5b54b4-cddhr 1/1 Running 0 3m12s
onos-config-5786dbc85c-rffv7 3/3 Running 0 3m12s
onos-e2t-5798f554b7-jgv27 2/2 Running 0 3m12s
onos-kpimon-555c9fdb5c-cgl5b 2/2 Running 0 3m12s
onos-topo-6b59c97579-pf5fm 2/2 Running 0 3m12s
onos-uenib-6f65dc66b4-b78zp 2/2 Running 0 3m12s
ran-simulator-5d9465df55-p8b9z 1/1 Running 0 3m12s
sd-ran-consensus-0 1/1 Running 0 3m12s
sd-ran-consensus-1 1/1 Running 0 3m12s
sd-ran-consensus-2 1/1 Running 0 3m12s
Note that the SD-RAN workload includes RANSIM as one of its pods; there is no separate "run simulator" step as is the case with gNBsim. To validate that the emulation ran correctly, query the ONOS CLI as follows:
Check onos-kpimon
to see if 6 cells are present:
$ kubectl exec -it deployment/onos-cli -n sdran -- onos kpimon list metrics
Check ran-simulator
to see if 10 UEs and 6 cells are present:
$ kubectl exec -it deployment/onos-cli -n sdran -- onos ransim get cells
$ kubectl exec -it deployment/onos-cli -n sdran -- onos ransim get ues
Check onos-topo
to see if E2Cell
is present:
$ kubectl exec -it deployment/onos-cli-n sdran -- onos topo get entity -v
UERANSIM
This blueprint runs UERANSIM in place of gNBsim, providing a second
way to direct workload at SD-Core. Of particular note, UERANSIM runs
iperf3
, making it possible to measure UPF throughput. (In
contrast, gNBsim primarily stresses the Core's Control Plane.)
The UERANSIM blueprint includes the following:
Global vars file
vars/main-ueransim.yml
gives the overall blueprint specification.Inventory file
hosts.ini
needs to be modified to identify the server that is to run UERANSIM. Currently, a second server is needed, as UERANSIM and SD-Core cannot be deployed on the same server. As an example,hosts.ini
might look like this:
[all]
node1 ansible_host=10.76.28.113 ansible_user=aether ansible_password=aether ansible_sudo_pass=aether
node2 ansible_host=10.76.28.115 ansible_user=aether ansible_password=aether ansible_sudo_pass=aether
[master_nodes]
node1
[worker_nodes]
#node2
[ueransim_nodes]
node2
New make targets,
ueransim-install
,ueransim-run
, andueransim-uninstall
, to be executed after the standard SD-Core installation.A new submodule
deps/ueransim
(corresponding to repoaether-ueransim
) defines the Ansible Roles and Playbooks required to deploy UERANSIM. It also contains configuration files for the emulator.The Jenkins pipeline
ueransim.groovy
validates the UERANSIM blueprint. It also illustrates how to run Linux commands that exercise the user plane from the emulated UE.
To use UERANSIM, first copy the vars file to main.yml
:
$ cd vars
$ cp main-ueransim.yml main.yml
Then edit hosts.ini
and vars/main.yml
to match your local
target servers, and deploy the base system (as in previous sections),
followed by UERANSIM:
$ make k8s-install
$ make 5gc-install
$ make ueransim-install
$ make ueransim-run
The last step actually starts UERANSIM, configured according to the
specification given in files custom-gnb.yaml
and
custom-ue.yaml
located in deps/ueransim/config
. Make target
ueransim-run
can be run multiple times, where doing so
reflects any recent edits to the config files. More information about
UERANSIM can be found on GitHub, including how to set up the
config files.
Finally, since the main value of UERANSIM is to measure user plane
throughput, you may want to play with the UPF's Quality-of-Service
parameters, as defined in
deps/5gc/roles/core/templates/sdcore-5g-values.yaml
. Specifically,
see both the UE-level settings associated with ue-dnn-qos
and the
slice-level settings associated with slice_rate_limit_config
.
Physical eNBs
Aether OnRamp is geared towards 5G, but it does support physical eNBs,
including 4G-based versions of both SD-Core and AMP. The 4G blueprint
has been demonstrated with SERCOMM's 4G/LTE CBRS Small Cell.
The blueprint uses all the same Ansible machinery outlined in earlier
sections, but starts with a variant of vars/main.yml
customized
for running physical 4G radios:
$ cd vars
$ cp main-eNB.yml main.yml
Assuming that starting point, the following outlines the key differences from the 5G case:
There is a 4G-specific repo, which you can find in
deps/4gc
.The
core
section ofvars/main.yml
specifies a 4G-specific values file:values_file: "deps/4gc/roles/core/templates/radio-4g-values.yaml"
The
amp
section ofvars/main.yml
specifies that 4G-specific models and dashboards get loaded into the ROC and Monitoring services, respectively:roc_models: "deps/amp/roles/roc-load/templates/roc-4g-models.json"
monitor_dashboard: "deps/amp/roles/monitor-load/templates/4g-monitor"
You need to edit two files with details for the 4G SIM cards you use. One is the 4G-specific values file used to configure SD-Core:
deps/4gc/roles/core/templates/radio-4g-values.yaml
The other is the 4G-specific Models file used to bootstrap ROC:
deps/amp/roles/roc-load/templates/radio-4g-models.json
There are 4G-specific Make targets for SD-Core (e.g.,
make aether-4gc-install
andmake aether-4gc-uninstall
), but the Make targets for AMP (e.g.,make aether-amp-install
andmake aether-amp-uninstall
) work unchanged in both 4G and 5G.
The Quick Start and Emulated RAN (gNBsim) deployments are for 5G only, but revisiting the previous sections—substituting the above for their 5G counterparts—serves as a guide for deploying a 4G blueprint of Aether. Note that the network is configured in exactly the same way for both 4G and 5G. This is because SD-Core's implementation of the UPF is used in both cases.
Enable SR-IOV and DPDK
UPF performance can be improved by enabling SR-IOV and DPDK. This blueprint supports both optimizations, where the former depends on the server NIC(s) being SR-IOV capable. The blueprint includes the following:
Global vars file
vars/main-sriov.yml
gives the overall blueprint specification.Inventory file
hosts.ini
is identical to that used throughout this Guide. There are no additional node groups.New make targets,
5gc-sriov-install
and5gc-sriov-uninstall
, to be executed along with the standard SD-Core installation (see below).New Ansible role (
sriov
) added to the5gc
submodule.SRIOV-specific override variables required to configure the core are included in a new template:
deps/5gc/roles/core/templates/sdcore-5g-sriov-values.yaml
.Integration tests require SR-IOV capable servers, and so have not been automated in Jenkins.
To use SR-IOV and DPDK, first copy the vars file to main.yml
:
$ cd vars
$ cp main-sriov.yml main.yml
You will see the main difference in the upf
block of the core
section:
upf:
ip_prefix: "192.168.252.0/24"
iface: "access"
mode: dpdk # Options: af_packet or dpdk
# If mode set to 'dpdk':
# - make sure at least two VF devices are created out of 'data_iface'
# and these devices are attached to vfio-pci driver;
# - use 'sdcore-5g-sriov-values.yaml' file for 'values_file' (above).
Note the VF device requirement in upf
block comments, and be sure
that the core
block points to the alternative override file:
values_file: "deps/5gc/roles/core/templates/sdcore-5g-sriov-values.yaml"
Deploying this blueprint involves the invoking the following sequence of Make targets:
$ make k8s-install
$ make 5gc-router-install
$ make 5gc-sriov-install
$ make 5gc-core-install
The 5gc-sriov-install
step happens after the Kubernetes cluster is
installed, but before the Core workload is instantiated on that
cluster. The corresponding playbook augments Kubernetes with the
required extensions. It has been written to do nothing unless variable
core.upf.mode
is set to dpdk
, where OnRamp now includes the
5gc-sriov-install
target as part of its default 5gc-install
target.
OAI 5G RAN
Aether can be configured to work with the open source gNB from OAI. The blueprint runs in either simulation mode or with a USRP software-defined radio connecting wirelessly to one or more off-the-shelf UEs. (OAI also supports USRP-based UEs, but this blueprint does not currently support that option; you need to deploy such a UE separately.)
The following assumes familiarity with the OAI 5G RAN stack, but it is not necessary to separately install the OAI stack. OnRamp installs both the Aether Core and the OAI RAN, plus the networking needed to interconnect the two.
Further Reading
The blueprint includes the following:
Global vars file
vars/main-oai.yml
gives the overall blueprint specification.Inventory file
hosts.ini
uses label[oai_nodes]
to denote the server(s) that host the gNB and (when configured in simulation mode) the UE. As with gNBsim,[oai_nodes]
can identify the same server as Kubernetes (where the 5G Core runs). Another possible configuration is to co-locate the gNB and UE on one server, with the 5G Core running on a separate server. (Although not necessary in principle, the current playbooks require the gNB and simulated UE be located on the same server.)New make targets,
oai-gnb-install
andoai-gnb-uninstall
, to be executed along with the standard SD-Core installation (see below). When running a simulated UE, targetsoai-uesim-start
andoai-uesim-stop
are also available.A new submodule
deps/oai
(corresponding to repoaether-oai
) defines the Ansible Roles and Playbooks required to deploy the OAI gNB.The Jenkins pipeline
oai.groovy
validates the OAI 5G blueprint. The pipeline runs OAI in simulation mode, but the blueprint has also been validated with USRP X310.
To use an OAI gNB, first copy the vars file to main.yml
:
$ cd vars
$ cp main-oai.yml main.yml
You will see the main difference is the addition of the oai
section:
oai:
docker:
container:
gnb_image: oaisoftwarealliance/oai-gnb:develop
ue_image: oaisoftwarealliance/oai-nr-ue:develop
network:
data_iface: ens18
name: public_net
subnet: "172.20.0.0/16"
bridge:
name: rfsim5g-public
simulation: true
gnb:
conf_file: deps/oai/roles/gNb/templates/gnb.sa.band78.fr1.106PRB.usrpb210.conf
ip: "172.20.0.2"
ue:
conf_file: deps/oai/roles/uEsimulator/templates/ue.conf
Variable simulation
is set to true
by default, causing OnRamp
to deploy the simulated UE. When set to false
, the simulated UE
is not deployed and it is instead necessary to configure the USRP and
a physical UE.
Note that instead of downloading and compiling the latest OAI
software, this blueprint pulls in the published images for both the
gNB and UE, corresponding to variables
docker.container.gnb_image
and docker.container.ue_image
,
respectively. If you plan to modify the OAI software, you will need to
change these values accordingly. See the Development Support section for guidance.
The network
block of the oai
section configures the necessary
tunnels so the gNB can connect to the Core's user and control planes.
Variable network.data_iface
needs to be modified in the same way
as in the core
and gnbsim
sections of vars/main.yml
, as
described throughout this Guide.
The path names associated with variables gnb.conf_file
and
ue.conf_file
are OAI-specific configuration files. The two
given by default are for simulation mode. The template directory for
the gNb
role also includes a configuration file for when the USRP
X310 hardware is to be deployed; edit variable gnb.conf_file
to point to that file instead. If you plan to use some other OAI
configuration file, note that the following two variables in the AMF
parameters
section need to be modified to work with the Aether Core:
amf_ip_address = ({ ipv4 = "{{ core.amf.ip }}"; });
GNB_IPV4_ADDRESS_FOR_NG_AMF = "{{oai.gnb.ip}}/24";
The core
section of vars/main.yml
is similar to that used in
other blueprints, with two variable settings of note. First,
ran_subnet
is set to "172.20.0.0/16"
and not the empty string
(""
). As a general rule, core.ran_subnet
is set to the empty
string whenever a physical gNB is on the same L2 network as the Core,
but in the case of an OAI-based gNB, the RAN stack runs in a
Macvlan-connected Docker container, and so the variable is set to
"172.20.0.0/16"
. (This is similar to how OnRamp configures the
Core for an emulated gNB using gNBsim.)
Second, variable values_file
is set to
"deps/5gc/roles/core/templates/sdcore-5g-values.yaml"
by default,
meaning simulated UEs uses the same PLMN and IMSI range as gNBsim.
When deploying with physical UEs, it is necessary to replace that
values file with one that matches the SIM cards you plan to use. One
option is to reuse the values file also used by the Physical RAN blueprint, meaning you would set the variable as:
values_file: "deps/5gc/roles/core/templates/radio-5g-values.yaml"
That file should be edited, as necessary, to match your configuration.
To deploy the OAI blueprint in simulation mode, run the following:
$ make k8s-install
$ make 5gc-install
$ make oai-gnb-install
$ make oai-uesim-start
To deploy the OAI blueprint with a software-defined radio and physical UE, first configure the USRP hardware as described in the USRP Hardware Manual.
Further Reading
Of particular note, you need to select whether the device is to
connect to the Aether Core using its 1-GigE or 10-GigE interface, and
make sure the OAI configuration file (corresponding to
gnb.conf_file
) sets the sd_addrs
variable to match the
interface you select. You also need to make sure the PLMN-related
values in the files specified by core.values_file
and
gnb.conf_file
(along with the SIM cards you burn) are
consistent. Once ready, run the following Make targets:
$ make k8s-install
$ make 5gc-install
$ make oai-gnb-install
The Physical RAN section of this Guide can be helpful in debugging the end-to-end setup, even though the gNB details are different.
srsRAN 5G
Aether can be configured to work with the open source gNB from srsRAN. The blueprint runs in simulation mode. (Support for USRP radio is currently work-in-progress.)
The following assumes familiarity with the srsRAN 5G stack, but it is not necessary to separately install the srsRAN stack. OnRamp installs both the Aether Core and srsRAN, plus the networking needed to interconnect the two.
Further Reading
The blueprint includes the following:
Global vars file
vars/main-srsran.yml
gives the overall blueprint specification.Inventory file
hosts.ini
uses label[srsran_nodes]
to denote the server(s) that host the gNB and (when configured in simulation mode) the UE. The srsRAN blueprint installs the gNB and UE on one server, with the 5G Core running on a separate server. (Although not necessary in principle, the current playbooks require the gNB and simulated UE be located on the same server.)New make targets,
srsran-gnb-install
andsrsran-gnb-uninstall
, to be executed along with the standard SD-Core installation (see below). When running a simulated UE, targetssrsran-uesim-start
andsrsran-uesim-stop
are also available.A new submodule
deps/srsran
(corresponding to repoaether-srsran
) defines the Ansible Roles and Playbooks required to deploy the srsRAN gNB.The Jenkins pipeline
srsran.groovy
validates the srsRAN 5G blueprint. The pipeline runs srsRAN in simulation mode.
To use an srsRAN gNB, first copy the vars file to main.yml
:
$ cd vars
$ cp main-srsran.yml main.yml
You will see the main difference is the addition of the srsran
section:
srsran:
docker:
container:
gnb_image: aetherproject/srsran-gnb:rel-0.0.1
ue_image: aetherproject/srsran-ue:rel-0.0.1
network:
data_iface: ens18
name: host
subnet: "172.20.0.0/16"
bridge:
name: rfsim5g-public
simulation: true
gnb:
conf_file: deps/srsran/roles/gNB/templates/gnb_zmq.conf
ip: "172.20.0.2"
ue:
conf_file: deps/srsran/roles/uEsimulator/templates/ue_zmq.conf
Variable simulation
is set to true
by default, causing OnRamp
to deploy the simulated UE. When set to false
, the simulated UE
is not deployed.
Note that instead of downloading and compiling the latest srsRAN
software, this blueprint pulls in the published images for both the
gNB and UE, corresponding to variables
docker.container.gnb_image
and docker.container.ue_image
,
respectively. If you plan to modify the srsRAN software, you will need to
change these values accordingly. See the Development Support section for guidance.
The network
block of the srsran
section configures the necessary
tunnels so the gNB can connect to the Core's user and control planes.
The path names associated with variables gnb.conf_file
and
ue.conf_file
are srsRAN-specific configuration files. The two
given by default are for simulation mode.
The core
section of vars/main.yml
is similar to that used in
other blueprints, with two variable settings of note. First,
set ran_subnet
to proper ran subnet as per your setup.
As a general rule, core.ran_subnet
is set to the empty(""
)
string whenever a physical gNB is on the same L2 network as the Core.
Second, variable values_file
is set to
"deps/5gc/roles/core/templates/sdcore-5g-values.yaml"
by default,
meaning simulated UEs uses the same PLMN and IMSI range as gNBsim.
When deploying with physical UEs, it is necessary to replace that
values file with one that matches the SIM cards you plan to use. One
option is to reuse the values file also used by the Physical RAN blueprint, meaning you would set the variable as:
values_file: "deps/5gc/roles/core/templates/radio-5g-values.yaml"
That file should be edited, as necessary, to match your configuration.
To deploy the srsRAN blueprint in simulation mode, run the following:
$ make k8s-install
$ make 5gc-install
$ make srsran-gnb-install
$ make srsran-uesim-start
Guidelines for Blueprints
Blueprints define alternate "on ramps" for using Aether. They are intended to provide users with different starting points, depending on the combination of features they are most interested in. The intent is also that users eventually "own" their own customized blueprint, for example by combining features from more than one of the set distributed with OnRamp. Not all such combinations are valid, and not all valid combinations have been been tested. This is why there is not currently one uber-blueprint that satisfies all requirements.
Users are encourage to contribute new blueprints to the official release, for example by adding one or more new features/capabilities, or possibly by demonstrating how to deploy a different combination of existing features. In addition to meeting the general definition of a blueprint (as introduced in the introduction to this section), we recommend the following guidelines.
Use Ansible best-practices for defining playbooks. This means using Ansible plugins rather than invoking shell scripts, whenever possible.
Avoid embedding configuration parameters in Ansible playbooks. Such parameters should be collected in either
vars/main-blueprint.yml
or a component-specific configuration file, depending on their purpose (see next item).Avoid exposing too many variables in
vars/main-blueprint.yml
. Their main purpose is direct how Ansible deploys Aether, and not to configure the individual subsystems of a given deployment. The latter details are best defined in component-specific configuration files (e.g., values override files), which can then be referenced byvars/main-blueprint.yml
. The exception is variables that enable/disable a particular feature. Two good examples arecore.standalone
andoai.simulation
.Keep blueprints narrow. One of their main values is to document (in code) how a particular feature is enabled and configured. Introduce new roles to keep playbooks narrow. Introduce new values override files (and other config files) to keep each configuration narrow. Introduce new
vars/main-blueprint.yml
files to document how a single feature is deployed. The exception is "combo" blueprints that combine multiple existing features (already enabled by single-feature blueprints) to deploy a comprehensive solution.